Author Archives: blogger

My Insurance Company Insures My Handbag Collection

Posted on by

I’m a fashionista with a passion for purses, in fact, I collect them. To many ladies, a bag is nothing more than a receptacle for used tissues, old receipts and a dog-eared paperback book that only gets read in the doctor’s waiting room, but to me, a ladies handbag is a masterpiece of beauty and functionality. Now, you may think it odd that I would want to insure something as apparently unimportant as a collection of handbags but I’ve got a reason for this. And before you ask, indeed, I do have life insurance cover because, even though I value my handbags, they are by no means more important than my existence.

I don’t buy many handbags and will save for years just to be in the fiscal position to buy one, but the point is, the bags I acquire have designer labels and are extremely precious. In addition to what it initially cost me to buy the hand bags I possess in my personal collection, there’s the additional value which derives from all of them being restricted edition originals. My purses are rare, particularly the antique ones, and that’s why I’ve covered every one of them. Now, you may even think it strange that an insurance company might even want to provide insurance for women’s purses, but they actually do, and for good cause.

If you are not convinced that handbag insurance is necessary then picture this situation: You’re in your car waiting at the traffic light and your purse is on the floorboards of the passenger area of the car. All of a sudden, the passenger window smashes in a spray of glass and a hand reaches in and grabs your purse. The authorities are not currently there to apprehend the fleeing offender. You feel and dazed and then stunned as it dawns on you that numerous items of critical significance to you are inside that bag! Your identification papers, your house keys, the cash you drew to pay the telephone account, your Blackberry, and your wallet with all your bank cards, to mention just a few. All of your precious belongings are gone! Without a doubt, it is entirely possible that you could, at some stage in your lifetime, end up in the predicament of getting had your purse taken. Then there is the chance of your handbag becoming lost or destroyed. The insurance industry understands this, which explains why you are likely to easily come across an insurance company that will assure your bag. The bag on its own might not be of anything apart from sentimental worth to you however its contents are another issue.

You might not be able to avoid the distress of losing precious items like bank cards and id books, yet you can certainly decrease the expense of replacing the valuables in your handbag if it’s insured. Handbag insurance is not very costly and you might even discover that your insurance company already makes provision for it as a portable possession on your current insurance policy. An important point to observe, however, is the fact that mobile phones, global positioning devices, and expensive designer sunglasses or prescribed spectacles are usually not covered by handbag insurance and will have to be insured separately.

Life Insurance And Taxation

Posted on by

If your company owns life insurance policies on your executives or any key people for that matter, you need to be aware of the potential tax ramifications and the requirements to avoid taxation of benefits. Important changes have taken place in the last few years that can significantly impact the taxation of corporate owned life insurance. The information below is designed to inform you of the IRS regulations that have been implemented over the last few years and what is needed to comply with these IRS requirements so that policy proceeds avoid needless taxation.*

Pension Protection Act of 2006 and Life Insurance Taxation

On August 17, 2006, President George Bush signed tax legislation containing provisions that significantly impact key man and other employer owned life insurance purchased after August 17, 2006. The legislation, known as the COLI (Corporate Owned Life Insurance) Best Practices Act (which is part of the Pension Protection Act of 2006), includes the proposed IRC Section 101(j). Under this proposed law, life insurance death benefits for business-owned life insurance policies issued after the effective date of August 17, 2006 are income taxable (to the extent the death benefit exceeds the employer’s premiums) unless certain requirements are met.

This new legislation applies to all employer-owned policies issued after August 17, 2006 and includes policies used for key man insurance, stock redemption plans, Corporate Owned Life Insurance and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans (among others). It may also extend to collateral assignment (economic benefit) regime split dollar and split dollar loans. With this law, all situations where an employer will have full or partial ownership of a insurance policy that is issued after August 17, 2006, regardless of the purpose of the policy, will need to meet certain requirements and follow specific guidelines to avoid potential taxation.

Avoiding Taxation of Key Man Life Insurance

In order to prevent policy proceeds (death benefits) from being income taxable, both of the following requirements must be met:

1. Notice and Consent Requirements:

a) The employee must be notified (in writing), prior to the life insurance policy being issued, that the employer intends to buy a policy on his/her life and disclose what the maximum face amount that is being applied for on his/her life is;

b) The employee must provide written consent to being insured and agree that the employer may choose to keep the policy in force even after the employee separates employment; and

c) The employee must be notified in writing that the employer is the beneficiary of all or part of the death benefit proceeds.

Under the COLI Best Practices Act, unless the employer provides written notice and obtains the employee’s written consent prior to the issuance of the policy, the death benefit of the life insurance policy will be taxable from day 1. Notice and consent may not be obtained after the life insurance policy is issued to remove this taxable death benefit status.

2. Once the “Notice and Consent Requirements” are met, there are two “Exceptions” to the rule taxing death proceeds payable to an employer, one of which must be met:

a.) Exception #1:

1) The insured was an employee at any time during the 12-month period before the insured’s death OR

2) The insured was a Director or “highly compensated employee” at the time the contract was issued.

b.) Exception #2:

Any amount received by the employer as a result of the insured’s death is paid to:

1) A family member of the insured;

2) A designated beneficiary of the insured under the contract other than the employer;

3) A trust established for the benefit of a family member, other designated beneficiary, or the insured’s estate; or

4) A family member, designated beneficiary, trust, or estate in exchange for any interest they hold in the corporation / employer (i.e. buy-sell agreement).

If both the “Notice and Consent Requirements” and one of the “Exceptions” above are met, Corporate Owned Life Insurance proceeds would be received income tax free if the policy death benefits would otherwise be eligible for favorable tax treatment.

COLI Best Practices Act- Reporting Requirements

All employers are required to report annually all corporate-owned life insurance policies to the IRS. The annual reporting requirements imposed under the IRC Sec. 6039I include:

1) The total number of employees at the end of the year;

2) The number of employees insured under COLI arrangement at the end of the year;

3) The total amount of insurance in force on all insured employees at the end of the year; and

4) The employer’s name, address, tax payer identification number and type of business, and

5) A statement of valid consent for each insured employee (or, if all required consents are not obtained, number of insured employees for who consent was not obtained).

The IRS requires this reporting annually on Form 8925 ” Report of Employer-Owned Life Insurance Contracts.” It is a simple form and must be completed to comply with IRS Code. You should consult your CPA or professional tax advisor immediately for more information on Form 8925 and the IRS reporting requirements.

If proper record keeping and reporting is not maintained, any and all key man life insurance policy proceeds or other corporate owned life insurance death benefits may be subject to income taxation

In Conclusion

Corporate Owned Life Insurance Policies including key man insurance policies issued after August 17, 2006 may have death benefits that are subject to income taxation if certain requirements are not met. The Pension Protection Act of 2006, which includes the COLI Best Practices Act, includes provisions that have significant consequences for key man and other employer owned insurance purchased after August 17, 2006. You need to understand the Notice and Consent requirements and well as the Exceptions and Record Keeping and Reporting requirements and comply with the IRS so that key man insurance policy proceeds avoid needless taxation. Unfortunately, if you have a key man policy issued after August 17, 2006 and you have not been compliant, your best bet to avoid potential income taxation may be to scrap your current policy and start over!

* All of the above tax information is for information purposes only and is provided to explain the basic tax treatment of life insurance based on the Internal Revenue Code. Any individual or entity considering any life insurance policy should consult with their own CPA or tax/legal advisor that understands their particular tax circumstances and the rules governing their state. In no way is this information intended to be tax or legal advice.

Is Paid Credit Card Payment Protection Only For Those That Don’t Need It

Posted on by

It’s the quandary that people in debt face every day: How do I spend as little as possible on debt and still manage my risk? Lenders might offer a person taking out a credit card extended credit card payment protection for a small monthly fee, but people may feel they don’t have the spare cash to spend on securing a balance. In their mind’s, paid credit card protection is for those people who are rich enough not to need it, because they can afford the additional cost of carrying it. However, this type of thinking is exactly the opposite of what should be going through someone’s mind when they’re offered payment protection. Instead, they should be weighing the risk of defaulting on debt more than the cost of the small monthly payment used to make sure they can continue making payments if they get ill or are made redundant in their jobs.

How the rich might weigh the risk of not carrying payment protection

First, rich people would figure out how much of a balance they typically carry and whether they have enough savings to cover the balance should they suddenly lose their business or get seriously ill. If they are already carry disability or life insurance, this might help in the case where they were suddenly diagnosed with an illness or suffered a major accident. It would not help them if they lost their business and the associated income. For that they would need to rely on their savings or investment accounts to help repay outstanding debts.

Or, rich people with huge outstanding balances may decide that claiming bankruptcy would be the better option if their hope of repaying their debt in a few years is miniscule when compared to the size of the debt. For those that don’t have the option of a large bank account or business investments to cover an outstanding credit balance, the paid credit card payment protection can offer some peace of mind when they lose a job or get sick or injured. This is much truer for someone who is depending on an employer and a healthy economy to keep from being made redundant. Business owners might decide that claiming bankruptcy makes more sense.

When bankruptcy is not an option

If your livelihood depends on being able to work in your profession, it may be a very bad idea to file bankruptcy to get rid of credit card debt – even if your business fails. Bankruptcy in the UK can bar certain professions from practicing if that individual is declared bankrupt by the courts. In such cases, a payment protection plan can offer some peace of mind that debt payments will be made and creditors will not force that individual into bankruptcy through non-payment. This will give them time to work out an individual voluntary arrangement to resolve all the debt without a bankruptcy declaration. This can not only save their credit for a time, but also save their potential earning power for the future when thing might be a whole lot better.

Other risks that demand that you take out credit card payment protection

Other types of risks that can help you decide whether you should pay the monthly fee for extra credit card protection is whether your loss will affect more than yourself. It may be one thing to lose a credit rating, but quite another if the loss of a job or an unexpected illness also puts your family at risk. If you can cover a mortgage with unemployment benefits for a period of time, but not the additional credit card payments, then you might want to consider taking out extra credit card payment protection. If you happen to be made redundant through no fault of your own, the benefits can mean that you will be able to keep your family fed and housed, even while maintaining a good credit history. This will undoubtedly help you if it takes a bit of time to find a new job or if a job offer is dependent on a good credit history. It can also save you from having to dip into retirement or investment accounts to make up the difference. When the risk of non-payment affects more than just you because you are the primary bread-winner, it makes sense to add extra protection to your accounts to keep you solvent even when things don’t go exactly as you had planned.

Is Health Insurance Exchange Navigator Program Attracting Criminals

Posted on by

The health insurance exchange navigator program has come to be seen as a life savior for the Obama administration after the healthcare.gov fiasco. With a crumbling website and all hands dedicated to keeping it from falling, the health insurance exchange navigators are making sure that people are able to go through the enrollment process. Some navigators are also utilizing the skills gained through the exchange navigator program and helping people with paper applications, especially when the online applications fail. In a nutshell, the millions of dollars given as grants to these navigators are being put to good use in every state.

However, there is a downside to this seemingly angelic attempt by organizations to help people enroll on the marketplaces. In the last couple of weeks, it has come to the notice of the government that several criminals and shady characters are making use of the exchange navigator program to make money. There have been several cases that have demonstrated hidden agenda of working navigators, including a suggestion for applicants to lie on their profile so that they can save a few dollars on premiums. For instance, in an incident in Dallas, three navigators were fired when they were caught on video trying to advise a senior citizen to not to mention tobacco use on his application as it might lower his chances of getting subsidy and low premiums.

Another incident of New York shows the loopholes in the health insurance exchange navigator program, and how a car service company, a cupcake bakery, and a spa saloon were listed as health insurance exchange navigators. While it is not clear whether this was done intentionally, it still exposes the gaps that exist in the whole selection process.

In the light of these events, several other states have become wary of criminals and illegitimate people making use of the exchange navigator program for their hidden agendas. Florida, for instance, has made sure that since these navigators have access to SSN and tax information of applicants who utilize their assistance, all such navigators need to be checked for a criminal history, including a fingerprinting check and criminal background check. Several other states are thinking to follow suit.

However, while these measures show the administration’s vigilance in selecting the right candidates for a job that puts them closer to sensitive information, such actions could cause a severe side effect which the government cannot sustain at the moment – obstruction of navigator function. Several navigators have complained that after receiving the federal grant, they have had to go through extensive interviews again and again for verification of their credibility. While these navigators do not find this to be extremely wrong, they cite wastage of time that could be used for enrolling people, as a major concern.

More About Family Dental Insurance

Posted on by

Nowadays dental disease is a very common problem and the treatment cost is more expensive. Family dental care plays an important role in our life. In a family dental care, three parties you, the dentist and a third party usually involves. The third party is responsible for funding and administration of the insurance plan. We can choose our own dentist otherwise the patient can receive treatment from any dentist. Based on the plans the insurance holder will pay 20 percent to 50 percent and the remaining 80 percent to 50 percent is paid by the insurance company. We cannot compare dental disease with medical disease because most of the dental problems are preventable. The patient’s regular checkup will cover by dental insurance. Dental insurance are designed to encourage the patients to get their checkup regularly, which is needed, for preventing the dental diseases. To take dental insurance is must by everyone.

For their families people are always looking for discount and cheap dental plans. Dr. O. Wayne Mortenson created the Mortenson Family Dental. In Kentucky and Indiana this family dental plan offers very best dental coverage. Across the United States, this family dental spread many areas. Mortenson Family Dental offers plans with great benefits and give the solution for the dental problems like Endodontic, Orthodontics, Rehabilitative dentistry, Cosmetic dentistry, Aesthetic dentistry, Rotary endodontic, Implant restoration, Oral conscious sedation, laser dentistry, surgical implant placement, sedation dentistry, invisalign, removable prosthetics, wisdom tooth removal, TMJ disorders and pediatric dentistry. Highly educated dentists practicing there will provide low cost high quality dental care.

Family dental insurances come with discounts on checkups, cleanings, braces and root canals. Around 108 million people lack dental insurance in US. Nowadays many family dental plans come with offers and discounts. Family dental insurance offers 10% to 60% on most dental procedures and also no health restrictions. Aetna, Ameritas, Anthem BCBS of KY/IN, Anthem Wellpoint Dental Blue, BCBS of Michigan, Careington (Platinum Plan only), Cigna PPO, Connection Dental, DHA/Assurant, Delta Dental PPO, Delta Dental Premier, Dental Benefit Providers (aka United Healthcare), Dental Care Plus, DBA – Dental Health Options, Denta Select, Dental Wellness Partners, Dentemax, Guardian, Health Resources, Humana, Maverest, Met Life, Preferred Health, Superior and United Concordia are the list of the Mortenson Family Dental Insurance. The Mortenson comprehensive dental insurance plan offers no pre-authorization requirements, no pre-existing condition limitations, no waiting periods (immediate eligibility), free orthodontic consultations, no yearly maximum, no deductibles and no claim forms. In the dual plans few limitations are for parent/child or for husband/wife only. Until the children reach the age of 23, the family plan allows the children.